The dawn of the 21st century has ushered in an era defined by unprecedented technological advancement, with Artificial Intelligence standing at the forefront of this revolution. AI\'s transformative power is reshaping industries, economies, and societies at a pace that often outstrips our capacity to fully grasp its implications. Among the sectors experiencing a profound metamorphosis due to AI, the energy industry stands out as particularly critical. As the world grapples with the existential challenges of climate change and the urgent need for a sustainable energy transition, AI offers a beacon of hope – promising to optimize grids, enhance renewable energy integration, and drive efficiency across the board. However, this immense potential comes with a complex web of ethical considerations that demand our immediate attention.
While AI\'s capacity to streamline energy systems and accelerate decarbonization is undeniable, its own energy footprint, coupled with ethical dilemmas concerning data privacy, algorithmic bias, and equitable access, presents a dual challenge. The very technologies designed to save the planet could, if unethically developed and deployed, exacerbate existing inequalities or create new environmental burdens. This article serves as an applied guide, delving into the latest developments in AI ethics specifically within the energy sector, offering a comprehensive look at the ethical considerations for AI in renewable energy and exploring robust AI ethics frameworks for energy transition. We aim to navigate this intricate landscape, providing modern, updated information for 2024-2025, practical examples, and actionable insights for fostering responsible AI energy consumption and achieving a truly sustainable energy future.
The intersection of Artificial Intelligence and the energy sector is a dynamic frontier, characterized by rapid innovation and a growing awareness of its profound ethical implications. What began primarily as a pursuit of efficiency gains has matured into a complex dialogue about responsibility, equity, and the long-term societal impact of AI-driven energy systems. Understanding this evolving landscape is crucial for anyone involved in shaping the future of energy.
Initially, the discourse around AI in energy was heavily focused on its operational benefits: optimizing power grids, predicting energy demand with greater accuracy, and enhancing the performance of renewable energy assets. AI promised smarter grids, reduced waste, and a more resilient energy infrastructure. While these benefits remain central, the past few years have witnessed a significant paradigm shift. Stakeholders are now increasingly concerned with the broader ethical implications that span the entire lifecycle of AI systems – from their design and development to deployment, maintenance, and eventual decommissioning. This shift acknowledges that technological solutions, no matter how efficient, must align with fundamental human values and societal well-being. The focus has expanded to include questions of data governance, algorithmic fairness in resource allocation, the environmental impact of AI itself, and ensuring that AI-driven energy transitions do not inadvertently create new forms of injustice or inequality.
To navigate this complex terrain, various AI ethics frameworks have emerged, providing guiding principles for responsible AI development and deployment. While specific frameworks may differ in their emphasis, common principles include: Fairness and Non-discrimination, ensuring that AI systems do not perpetuate or amplify existing biases in energy access or cost; Transparency and Explainability, making AI\'s decision-making processes understandable and auditable, especially when critical energy decisions are involved; Accountability, clearly defining who is responsible when AI systems fail or cause harm; Safety and Reliability, guaranteeing that AI-controlled energy infrastructure operates securely and without unintended consequences; and Privacy and Data Governance, protecting the vast amounts of sensitive consumer and operational data collected by smart energy systems. For instance, applying fairness principles in energy might mean designing AI algorithms that ensure equitable distribution of renewable energy benefits, rather than concentrating them in affluent areas, or preventing AI from disproportionately increasing energy costs for low-income households based on usage patterns. Transparency becomes paramount when AI recommends shutting down parts of a grid, requiring clear explanations for such critical actions.
The growing recognition of AI\'s ethical dimensions has prompted a wave of global initiatives and regulatory efforts aimed at establishing guardrails for its development. The European Union\'s AI Act, for example, categorizes AI systems by risk level, imposing stringent requirements on high-risk applications, many of which could apply to critical infrastructure like energy management. This includes obligations for data governance, human oversight, cybersecurity, and conformity assessments. Similarly, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) in the United States offers a voluntary, flexible, and comprehensive approach to managing risks associated with AI, emphasizing governance, mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks across sectors, including energy. These regulatory pressures are compelling energy companies to move beyond voluntary ethical guidelines and integrate robust ethical considerations into their AI strategies. They necessitate a proactive approach to risk assessment, compliance, and the development of internal governance structures to ensure that AI deployments in energy are not only efficient but also legally compliant and socially responsible. The trend is clear: the future of AI in energy will be shaped not just by technological prowess, but by adherence to a growing body of ethical and regulatory standards.
Artificial Intelligence presents a paradox to the energy sector: it is simultaneously a significant consumer of energy and a powerful tool for achieving energy sustainability. Understanding this dual impact is fundamental to developing responsible AI strategies for the energy transition.
The rapid advancements in AI, particularly in areas like large language models (LLMs) and deep learning, have been accompanied by a substantial increase in their energy consumption. Training these sophisticated models requires immense computational power, often involving thousands of Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) running continuously for weeks or months. This translates into a significant electricity demand, primarily for the computational operations themselves and the extensive cooling systems required to prevent hardware overheating in data centers. For example, estimates suggest that the training of a single large-scale AI model can consume as much electricity as several homes use in a year, and potentially generate hundreds of tons of carbon emissions. The \"inference\" stage, where trained models are used for predictions or decision-making, also contributes to the energy footprint, especially as AI applications become more pervasive. Data centers, which house these powerful AI servers, are already major electricity consumers, and the proliferation of AI is only set to amplify this trend. The environmental cost of this computational intensity is a critical ethical concern, challenging the perception of AI as an inherently \"green\" technology.
Despite its own energy demands, AI remains an unparalleled catalyst for accelerating the global transition to sustainable energy. Its analytical capabilities are transforming how we generate, distribute, and consume power. In smart grids, AI algorithms optimize energy flow, reduce transmission losses, and prevent outages by predicting equipment failures. For renewable energy sources like wind and solar, AI enhances forecasting accuracy, allowing grid operators to better integrate intermittent power into the energy mix and minimize reliance on fossil fuel backups. AI also plays a crucial role in optimizing energy storage solutions, deciding when to charge and discharge batteries to maximize efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, AI-driven demand-side management programs empower consumers to reduce their energy consumption through personalized recommendations and automated smart home systems. Practical examples include AI platforms that predict electricity prices to inform optimal charging times for electric vehicles, or systems that use machine learning to fine-tune the pitch of wind turbine blades in real-time to capture maximum wind energy, even in turbulent conditions. These applications demonstrate AI\'s potential to significantly reduce overall energy waste and accelerate decarbonization efforts.
Accurately quantifying the energy impact of AI systems is a complex but essential task for responsible development. Researchers and organizations are increasingly employing methodologies such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental footprint of AI, encompassing not only the operational energy use (training and inference) but also the embodied energy in hardware manufacturing, data storage, and network infrastructure. However, significant challenges persist. Measuring the indirect impacts, such as the energy consumed by the vast supply chains that support AI development or the energy required for data acquisition and labeling, is notoriously difficult. There\'s also a lack of standardized reporting metrics, making direct comparisons between different AI models or applications challenging. Many estimates rely on broad assumptions, and the rapid evolution of AI hardware and algorithms means that figures can quickly become outdated. Ethical considerations demand greater transparency from AI developers regarding their energy consumption, and the development of robust, standardized methodologies for measurement and reporting is a crucial step towards fostering responsible AI energy consumption. This will enable better decision-making and incentivize the development of more energy-efficient AI solutions, often referred to as \"Green AI.\"
As Artificial Intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in renewable energy systems, a unique set of ethical challenges emerges. These challenges demand careful consideration to ensure that the transition to a sustainable energy future is also a just and equitable one.
The rise of decentralized energy grids, often leveraging AI for optimized management of distributed energy resources (DERs) like rooftop solar and battery storage, presents significant opportunities for energy independence and resilience. However, without careful ethical design, AI in these systems can exacerbate existing inequalities or create new forms of energy inequity. Fairness considerations dictate that AI algorithms managing microgrids or local energy trading platforms should not inadvertently favor certain demographics or economic groups, leaving vulnerable populations with higher energy costs or less reliable access. For instance, if AI-driven systems optimize for maximum profit for prosumers (producers-consumers) without considering social equity, it could lead to energy poverty for those unable to invest in DERs. Ethical frameworks must ensure that AI systems promote equitable access to renewable energy benefits, transparently allocate resources during peak demand or outages, and do not introduce algorithmic biases that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. This means actively designing AI to foster energy democracy, where all participants have a fair stake in the energy system, rather than concentrating benefits among a select few.
AI\'s strength in renewable energy often lies in its ability to forecast intermittent generation from solar and wind farms with high accuracy, enabling better grid integration. However, many advanced AI models, particularly deep learning networks, operate as \"black boxes,\" making their decision-making processes opaque. This lack of transparency and explainability (XAI) poses significant ethical challenges. When an AI system recommends a particular action for grid balancing based on complex forecasts – such as curtailing renewable generation or dispatching expensive peaker plants – stakeholders need to understand the reasoning behind these critical decisions. Without explainability, trust in AI-driven energy management can erode among grid operators, policymakers, and the public. Ethical considerations demand that AI systems used for renewable energy forecasting provide clear, comprehensible insights into their predictions, including confidence levels and the key factors influencing their output. This is crucial for accountability, allowing human operators to validate decisions, identify potential errors or biases, and ultimately build confidence in the reliability and safety of AI-enhanced renewable energy infrastructure. The goal is not just accurate prediction, but trustworthy prediction.
Smart energy networks, powered by AI, rely on the collection and analysis of vast amounts of data – from individual household energy consumption patterns to critical infrastructure performance metrics. This data fuels AI\'s ability to optimize, predict, and manage energy resources, but it also introduces profound ethical concerns regarding data privacy and cybersecurity. The detailed consumption data collected by smart meters, for example, can reveal sensitive information about occupants\' daily routines, habits, and even presence at home, raising significant privacy risks if mishandled. Furthermore, the interconnected nature of AI-driven smart grids makes them potential targets for cyber-attacks, which could lead to widespread disruptions, data breaches, or even physical damage to infrastructure. Ethical considerations for AI in renewable energy systems necessitate robust data governance frameworks that prioritize privacy-by-design, implement strong encryption and anonymization techniques, and ensure explicit consent for data usage. Equally important are comprehensive cybersecurity measures to protect against malicious actors who might seek to exploit AI vulnerabilities for sabotage or data theft. Responsible AI energy consumption extends beyond just efficiency; it encompasses the secure and ethical handling of the foundational data that powers these intelligent systems, safeguarding both individual privacy and national security.
Transitioning to a future where AI responsibly powers our energy needs requires more than just technological prowess; it demands a systematic approach to ethical integration. This section provides practical guidelines and explores robust AI ethics frameworks for energy transition, emphasizing actionable steps for organizations.
For energy companies leveraging AI, establishing clear and comprehensive AI ethics policies is paramount. These policies serve as internal governance documents, articulating the organization\'s commitment to responsible AI development and deployment. Key components should include: a defined set of ethical principles (e.g., fairness, transparency, accountability, sustainability) tailored to the energy context; guidelines for data collection, usage, and privacy protection; protocols for identifying and mitigating algorithmic bias, especially in decision-making related to energy access or pricing; mechanisms for human oversight and intervention in AI-driven systems; and a clear process for addressing ethical dilemmas or complaints. Many leading energy firms are now forming internal AI ethics committees or review boards, composed of diverse experts from AI, engineering, ethics, and legal departments. These bodies are tasked with evaluating new AI projects for ethical risks, ensuring compliance with internal policies and external regulations, and fostering a culture of ethical awareness throughout the organization. Developing these policies is not a one-time event but an ongoing process of review and adaptation as AI technology and regulatory landscapes evolve.
Embracing a lifecycle approach to sustainable AI development, often referred to as \"Green AI,\" is crucial for minimizing the environmental footprint of AI in energy. This involves considering energy consumption and ethical implications at every stage, from conceptualization to deployment and retirement. It starts with selecting energy-efficient algorithms and hardware during the design phase, prioritizing models that achieve desired performance with less computational intensity. During the training phase, optimizing data size, model architecture, and hyper-parameters can significantly reduce energy use. Cloud providers are also offering \"green\" computing options powered by renewable energy, which should be prioritized. For inference, deploying efficient edge AI solutions where appropriate can reduce data transmission energy. Furthermore, the lifecycle approach extends to the ethical sourcing of raw materials for AI hardware and responsible e-waste management at the end of a system\'s life. This holistic perspective ensures that AI\'s benefits for energy sustainability are not negated by its own environmental costs. The table below illustrates key considerations across the AI lifecycle.
| AI Lifecycle Stage | Sustainable AI Considerations | Ethical Considerations for AI in Renewable Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Definition & Data Collection | Is the problem solvable with minimal AI? Is data acquisition energy-efficient? | Bias in data (e.g., smart meter data from affluent areas), privacy implications of data collection. |
| Model Design & Development | Prioritize efficient algorithms, model compression, smaller architectures. | Fairness (e.g., avoiding discrimination in energy allocation algorithms), transparency in model choices. |
| Training & Validation | Use energy-efficient hardware, optimize hyperparameters, leverage green data centers. | Accountability for training data sources, explainability of validation metrics. |
| Deployment & Inference | Edge computing where possible, efficient scaling, real-time energy monitoring. | Reliability and safety of deployed systems, equitable access to AI-driven services. |
| Monitoring & Maintenance | Continuous optimization for energy efficiency, regular ethical audits. | Ongoing fairness checks, transparency in system updates, user feedback mechanisms. |
| Decommissioning | Responsible e-waste management, data deletion policies. | Ensuring long-term data privacy, preventing legacy biases from persisting. |
Building and maintaining public trust is fundamental for the successful and ethical adoption of AI in the energy sector. This requires proactive and transparent stakeholder engagement. Energy companies must move beyond internal discussions and actively involve a diverse range of stakeholders, including consumers, local communities, environmental organizations, regulatory bodies, and academic experts. This engagement should aim to understand public concerns about AI\'s impact on energy affordability, reliability, privacy, and environmental justice. For instance, when implementing AI-driven demand response programs, transparent communication about how personal data is used, what benefits consumers can expect, and how their autonomy is protected is crucial. Community forums, public consultations, and collaborative design workshops can help identify potential ethical blind spots and ensure that AI solutions are developed with societal values in mind. By fostering open dialogue and incorporating diverse perspectives, energy companies can ensure that their AI strategies are not only technically sound but also socially acceptable and ethically robust, thereby enhancing public trust in the responsible AI energy consumption and energy transition.
Examining real-world applications offers invaluable insights into the practical challenges and opportunities of integrating AI ethics into the energy sector. These case studies highlight both the immense potential of responsible AI and the complexities that demand careful navigation.
One of the most widely cited examples of AI improving energy efficiency comes from Google\'s own data centers. In 2016, and continuously refined since, Google deployed DeepMind AI to optimize the massive cooling systems in its data centers. By analyzing vast amounts of sensor data (temperature, pressure, pump speeds, etc.) and predicting future conditions, the AI system could make real-time adjustments to cooling infrastructure, leading to significant energy savings, reportedly reducing cooling energy consumption by up to 40% and overall data center energy usage by 15%. This is a prime example of AI\'s ability to drive sustainable AI energy impact through operational efficiency. From an ethical standpoint, this application largely focuses on resource optimization, which is inherently positive. However, broader ethical considerations for such technologies include the potential for resource concentration (further empowering large tech companies with energy efficiency secrets), and the ethical implications of how such powerful optimization algorithms might be applied to other critical resources, potentially leading to unfair distribution if not carefully governed. It sets a benchmark for what is possible in energy efficiency but also underscores the need for transparency and equitable access to such advanced optimization tools.
AI is increasingly used in demand response programs, which incentivize consumers to reduce or shift their electricity use during peak periods to stabilize the grid and reduce reliance on expensive, often fossil-fuel-based, peaker plants. Companies like OhmConnect and bidgely utilize AI to analyze household energy consumption patterns, predict future demand, and then send personalized recommendations or even automate smart home devices (with user consent) to optimize energy use. This empowers consumers by offering financial incentives and greater control over their energy footprint. Ethically, these programs face challenges around consumer autonomy and fairness. While opt-in systems respect autonomy, there\'s a fine line between helpful recommendations and subtle manipulation. Ensuring fairness means designing algorithms that do not disproportionately burden vulnerable populations who may not have smart home devices or the flexibility to shift their energy use. Transparency about how AI makes recommendations and how consumer data is used is vital. Best practices include clear communication, user-friendly interfaces that prioritize user control, robust data privacy policies, and mechanisms to ensure equitable access and benefits across diverse socioeconomic groups, fostering responsible AI energy consumption.
AI is playing a pivotal role in modernizing aging energy grids, enhancing their resilience against extreme weather events, cyber-attacks, and fluctuating renewable energy inputs. AI-powered predictive maintenance systems can anticipate equipment failures in substations or transmission lines, allowing for proactive repairs and preventing widespread outages. During and after natural disasters, AI can rapidly assess damage, optimize restoration efforts, and reconfigure grid segments to maintain power to critical infrastructure. For example, utilities like Commonwealth Edison (ComEd) in Illinois have deployed AI to identify potential issues before they become major problems, significantly improving grid reliability. The ethical considerations here are profound. Ensuring equitable access to resilient energy is paramount; AI solutions must not inadvertently prioritize wealthier areas for grid upgrades or faster restoration times. There\'s also the ethical responsibility of ensuring the AI systems themselves are secure against cyber threats, as a compromised AI managing critical infrastructure could have catastrophic consequences. Transparency in decision-making during emergencies, accountability for AI performance in high-stakes situations, and a focus on social equity in resilience planning are emerging best practices for ethical considerations for AI in renewable energy and grid modernization. This involves designing AI systems to explicitly consider and prioritize vulnerable communities during disaster response and long-term infrastructure planning.
The journey towards ethical and sustainable AI in energy is still in its early stages. Navigating this path requires foresight, collaborative effort, and a continuous commitment to innovation and responsible development. The challenges are substantial, but so are the opportunities for transformative impact.
One of the most pressing challenges for AI ethics in energy is the \"compute gap\" – the increasing energy demands of advanced AI models contrasting with the urgent need for decarbonization. While AI offers immense potential for energy optimization, its growing carbon footprint from training and inference cannot be ignored. The road ahead demands significant innovation in \"Green AI.\" This includes developing more energy-efficient algorithms and neural network architectures that can achieve high performance with fewer computational resources. Hardware innovation is equally critical, focusing on specialized chips (e.g., neuromorphic computing) that mimic the human brain\'s energy efficiency, and more sustainable manufacturing processes for AI hardware. Research into federated learning, which allows AI models to be trained on decentralized data without moving it to a central server, can also reduce data transfer energy. Furthermore, the development of robust metrics and transparent reporting standards for AI\'s energy consumption will be essential to incentivize and track progress in this area. The opportunity lies in making Green AI a core principle of every AI development project in the energy sector, ensuring that the tools we build to fight climate change don\'t inadvertently contribute to it.
The complexities of AI ethics and energy demand a truly interdisciplinary approach. No single field possesses all the answers. The road ahead requires robust collaboration between AI researchers and engineers, energy system operators, ethicists, sociologists, economists, legal experts, and policymakers. This collaboration is crucial for developing comprehensive AI ethics frameworks for energy transition that are technically feasible, ethically sound, and socially acceptable. For instance, ethicists can help identify potential biases in AI algorithms designed by engineers, while energy experts can ensure that ethical guidelines are practical within operational constraints. Furthermore, there\'s a growing need for policy harmonization across different jurisdictions. As AI-driven energy systems become more interconnected globally, a patchwork of conflicting regulations could hinder innovation and create compliance nightmares. International cooperation on establishing common ethical principles and regulatory standards for AI in critical infrastructure like energy will be vital for ensuring responsible global deployment and fostering a level playing field for innovation. This will also help in addressing the ethical considerations for AI in renewable energy on a global scale.
Ultimately, the success of ethical AI in energy hinges on the human element. The future workforce in both AI and energy must be equipped with a strong understanding of ethical principles and their practical application. This means integrating AI ethics into engineering, computer science, and energy management curricula across universities and vocational training programs. Professionals already in the field require continuous education and upskilling to stay abreast of evolving ethical challenges and best practices. Training should go beyond theoretical concepts, incorporating practical case studies, ethical dilemma simulations, and tools for conducting ethical impact assessments. Fostering a culture of responsibility within organizations, where ethical considerations are part of every project from conception, is paramount. This includes empowering employees to raise ethical concerns without fear of reprisal and providing clear channels for resolution. By investing in education and training, we can cultivate a generation of AI and energy professionals who are not only technically proficient but also ethically literate, ensuring that AI serves humanity\'s best interests in the crucial transition to a sustainable energy future, promoting responsible AI energy consumption and sustainable AI energy impact.
The primary ethical challenge is ensuring that AI\'s immense power to optimize energy systems and accelerate the transition to renewables does not inadvertently create or exacerbate social inequalities, compromise individual privacy, or contribute to its own significant carbon footprint, all while maintaining transparency and accountability.
Energy companies can implement ethical AI practices by developing comprehensive AI ethics policies, establishing internal ethics review boards, adopting a lifecycle approach to sustainable AI development (Green AI), prioritizing data privacy and cybersecurity, and actively engaging diverse stakeholders in the design and deployment of AI solutions.
Yes, AI is highly beneficial, but its own energy consumption is a critical ethical consideration. While training large AI models can be energy-intensive, AI\'s ability to optimize energy grids, enhance renewable energy forecasting, and drive efficiency across the entire energy value chain often leads to net positive environmental benefits. The focus is on developing \"Green AI\" to minimize its footprint.
Data privacy is paramount in smart grids because they collect vast amounts of sensitive consumer data (e.g., energy usage patterns). AI ethics mandates robust data governance, anonymization, and security measures to protect this information from misuse, breaches, or profiling, ensuring that individual privacy is respected while leveraging data for grid optimization.
Ensuring fairness involves actively designing AI algorithms to avoid biases that could disproportionately affect certain demographic or socioeconomic groups. This includes fair allocation of energy resources, equitable access to renewable energy benefits, transparent pricing models, and safeguards against AI-driven energy poverty, often requiring diverse data sets and regular bias audits.
\"Green AI\" principles in the energy context refer to a holistic approach to minimizing the environmental impact of AI systems. This includes developing energy-efficient algorithms and hardware, optimizing model training and inference for lower power consumption, utilizing renewable energy-powered data centers, and considering the entire lifecycle of AI hardware from production to disposal.
The nexus of Artificial Intelligence and energy stands as one of the most critical frontiers in our collective quest for a sustainable future. As this applied guide has illuminated, AI possesses an unparalleled capacity to revolutionize the energy sector, offering powerful tools for grid optimization, enhanced renewable energy integration, and profound efficiency gains. However, this transformative potential is inextricably linked with a complex array of ethical considerations – ranging from AI\'s own growing energy footprint and the imperative of responsible AI energy consumption, to the critical issues of data privacy, algorithmic fairness, and equitable access to energy resources. The latest developments in AI ethics for energy, particularly in 2024-2025, underscore a pivotal shift from merely pursuing efficiency to embedding deep responsibility into every stage of AI development and deployment.
Achieving a truly sustainable and just energy transition demands a proactive, multi-faceted approach. We must embrace \"Green AI\" principles, vigorously pursuing innovations that reduce AI\'s computational burden while maximizing its positive impact. The establishment of robust AI ethics frameworks for energy transition, coupled with clear internal policies and continuous stakeholder engagement, is not merely a compliance exercise but a fundamental pillar for building public trust and ensuring societal benefit. Practical examples from leading organizations demonstrate that it is possible to leverage AI for significant energy savings while navigating complex ethical landscapes. Looking ahead, interdisciplinary collaboration, policy harmonization, and a sustained commitment to ethical education and training will be paramount. By consciously prioritizing ethical considerations for AI in renewable energy and across the broader energy ecosystem, we can harness AI\'s immense power as a net positive force, driving us towards a future where energy is not only abundant and clean but also just, equitable, and accessible for all.
Site Name: Hulul Academy for Student Services
Email: info@hululedu.com
Website: hululedu.com
Very good
Nice
Hi
Explore more similar content
Unlock the power of AI! This guide deeply analyzes modern AI implementation trends, offering essential AI adoption strategies and an enterprise AI deployment guide. Explore emerging technologies, future insights, and AI integration best practices ...
Unpack the future of AI! Our deep analysis explores Modern AI research trends, dissecting emerging technologies, latest breakthroughs, and the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence. Discover key innovations shaping tomorrow\'s AI.
Navigate the complex intersection of AI ethics and energy. Our applied guide reveals the latest AI ethics in energy developments, offering critical insights for sustainable and responsible AI consumption in the energy transition.